Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
900-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

900-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.970275 50.864996)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.970218 50.864990,-0.970220 50.865001,-0.970228 50.865011,-0.970241 50.865019,-0.970256 50.865024,-0.970274 50.865026,-0.970292 50.865025,-0.970308 50.865020,-0.970320 50.865012,-0.970329 50.865002,-0.970332 50.864991,-0.970329 50.864980,-0.970321 50.864970,-0.970309 50.864962,-0.970293 50.864956,-0.970276 50.864954,-0.970258 50.864956,-0.970242 50.864961,-0.970229 50.864969,-0.970221 50.864979,-0.970218 50.864990)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL